<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hannush Web Design SEO Blog &#187; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hannush.com/blog/tag/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hannush.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:09:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hannush #1 in Greenville Web Design Says Yahoo and Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/seo-web/2010/hannush-1-in-greenville-web-design-says-yahoo-and-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/seo-web/2010/hannush-1-in-greenville-web-design-says-yahoo-and-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Hannush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannush.com/blog/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a couple of years now, we have been perplexed as to handle three search engines when it comes to search results.  Google likes things that Bing and Yahoo! don&#8217;t like so its hard to win in all three (so we pretty much focused on Google). Today two of those companies combined their results.  Yahoo! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a couple of years now, we have been perplexed as to handle three search engines when it comes to search results.  Google likes things that Bing and Yahoo! don&#8217;t like so its hard to win in all three (so we pretty much focused on Google).</p>
<p>Today two of those companies combined their results.  Yahoo! now is supplied search results from Bing and low and behold&#8230;when searching &#8220;Web Design Greenville&#8221; in both Bing and Yahoo! we finally cracked #1.  Persistence pays off (along with a helpful merger)!</p>
<p>It will be a couple of weeks until we get a real handle on how Yahoo and Bing are going to handle search results, but this shows that if you design a website with good clean code, a strong SEO based content management system and you get yourself established, it will all pay off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/seo-web/2010/hannush-1-in-greenville-web-design-says-yahoo-and-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Your News Posted On Google, Bing, Yahoo!</title>
		<link>http://www.hannush.com/blog/search-marketing/2009/getting-your-news-posted-on-google-bing-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hannush.com/blog/search-marketing/2009/getting-your-news-posted-on-google-bing-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Hannush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannush.com/blog/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A client today had an interesting question.  With the rise of blogs, social media, and rss / atom feeds, it is much easier to present your website updates as news.  And the search engines are obliging by now indexing this content faster and more efficiently. What if you are provider of daily news updates?  How [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A client today had an interesting question.  With the rise of blogs, social media, and rss / atom feeds, it is much easier to present your website updates as news.  And the search engines are obliging by now indexing this content faster and more efficiently.</p>
<p>What if you are provider of daily news updates?  How do you get your site featured on Google News, Yahoo! News and Bing News where people are seeing this breaking content?</p>
<p>One search engine has this down to a science, the other two are still a bit in the stone age&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-411"></span>Leave it to Google to make the process easy.  Just like submitting a website to the general search engine, submitting to Google News is as simple as just <a title="Google News" href="http://www.google.com/support/news_pub/bin/request.py?contact_type=suggest_content" target="_blank">filling out a form</a> for your website.  One entry&#8230;then just like the old directory days of Yahoo! site submission, you just wait for a human to approve your site.  Then Google takes over and adds your stories automatically.</p>
<p>Not so easy with Yahoo!  For them, the best answer I can find is to submit every story individually.  If you are legitimate news source with a team of reporters, this could become a full time job.</p>
<p>Bing is even worse&#8230;they tell you to just email bns@microsoft.com and tell them you have a link you&#8217;d like included.  Then wait for a confirmation email from someone telling you it was included.</p>
<p>Really?</p>
<p>If anyone knows a better way, place a comment on this thread with information or a better source&#8230;I can&#8217;t imaging this is still how they are doing it, but according to both the <a title="Bing News Submit" href="http://www.bing.com/community/forums/p/647262/9532993.aspx#9532993" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> and <a title="Yahoo News Submit" href="http://help.yahoo.com/fast/help/us/news/cgi_submitsource" target="_blank">Yahoo </a>official sites, this is the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hannush.com/blog/search-marketing/2009/getting-your-news-posted-on-google-bing-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and Yahoo! Search Results To Change Again</title>
		<link>http://www.hannush.com/blog/search-marketing/2009/google-and-yahoo-search-results-to-change-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hannush.com/blog/search-marketing/2009/google-and-yahoo-search-results-to-change-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Hannush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannush.com/blog/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when you thought Bing was the only (somewhat) new kid on the block to worry about.  Business owners may need to brace again for another change in Google and Yahoo! rankings. First, today Dan Rampton of Yahoo! Search announced on the Yahoo! Search Blog  that a web reindexing was occurring at the #2 search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when you thought Bing was the only (somewhat) new kid on the block to worry about.  Business owners may need to brace again for another change in Google and Yahoo! rankings.</p>
<p>First, today Dan Rampton of Yahoo! Search announced on the Yahoo! Search Blog  that a web reindexing was occurring at the #2 search engine and you should prepare to see new rankings in the next few days.   In addition, a couple weeks ago Google introduced &#8220;Caffeine&#8221; a redesigned search engine that will become the new Google engine once beta testing is complete.</p>
<p>So what changes are afoot for business owners who count on results from these two engines?<span id="more-367"></span></p>
<p>Well, thankfully there isn&#8217;t a major mystery with Google.  By providing a <a title="Google Caffeine" href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/" target="_blank">public beta test</a>, Google again shows that it is concerned with making sure the public positively receives the new search engine.  In fact, they offer a link at the bottom of the test engine to ask viewers to let them know if you disapprove of anything about the new search.</p>
<p>From our testing, search results are changing slightly in Google but there doesn&#8217;t seem to be a major shift.  In addition, right now there is little or no media (YouTube videos, etc.) in the results. Our guess is, they just haven&#8217;t added those in yet.  That is the only problem&#8230;if Google is truly listening to complaints about the new search, it may still change from where it is now.</p>
<p>We do know that Google is concentrating on improving the speed of the engine and the speed in which social media is being indexed (a response to Twitter&#8217;s lightning fast response to news stories).  There is also discussion that the new search engine will be stronger in indexing news, which could mean hot stories may step in front of static web pages.  Our advice for now is, don&#8217;t make any major changes&#8230;always concentrate on the most important aspects of SEO, including good targeted keywords, critical structure elements optimized, and clean design.</p>
<p>As for Yahoo! and Bing&#8230;we will watch and learn.  Unfortunately we will need to wait until we see the changes before we can make suggestions.  It is important to note though that Bing seems to be working in opposition to Google&#8217;s methods.  A quantity of elements over quality seems to rule Bing and optimizing for Bing at this moment could have adverse affects on your Google rankings.  So, this fall many search engine strategies will be adjusted.</p>
<p>If search results are critical to your business, keep close contact with your <a title="Hannush Web Design" href="http://www.hannush.com/small-business-services/39-website-design.html">web designer</a> or <a title="Internet Marketing" href="http://www.hannush.com/small-business-services/35-seo-web2-consulting.html?tab=seo20consulting">Internet Marketing professional</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hannush.com/blog/search-marketing/2009/google-and-yahoo-search-results-to-change-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Title Tags for Search Engine Success</title>
		<link>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/title-tags-for-search-engine-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/title-tags-for-search-engine-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Hannush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[title tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannush.com/blog/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you&#8217;re looking to search optimize your site and you&#8217;ve spent some money on getting a keyword analysis.  What now? Its time to start looking at some of the elements of your website that are critical to search engine success. Next to the website&#8217;s URL, the site&#8217;s title tag ranks very high on the mythical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re looking to search optimize your site and you&#8217;ve spent some money on getting a <a title="Keyword Analysis" href="http://www.hannush.com/small-business-services/53-keyword-analysis.html?tab=seo20consulting">keyword analysis</a>.  What now?</p>
<p>Its time to start looking at some of the elements of your website that are critical to search engine success.<span id="more-340"></span></p>
<p>Next to the website&#8217;s URL, the site&#8217;s title tag ranks very high on the mythical search engine favorability chart.  Title tags show up in two very important places.  First, if you bookmark a page or look at the top of your browser, you&#8217;ll see the title tag prominently displayed.  But the other place a title tag is used is in your organic listing in Google, Yahoo! or Bing.  If you have the right stuff in your title tag, including those juicy keyword phrases you just spent that money on&#8230;it can make your organic listing as eye-catching as your AdWord advertisement.</p>
<p>So what should you put into your title tag?  How should you format it?  Here are a few tips for those wishing to use this powerful element.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>First off, don&#8217;t go overboard</strong><br />
Google, Yahoo! and Bing on average only show 60-70 characters.  The other words will still get some power, but your tag will be cut off in search engine results.</li>
<li><strong>Use keyword phrases</strong><br />
Okay, pick one or  two keyword phrases that are related to your page content (especially the main title of your page&#8230;the &lt;h1&gt; tag to you coders).  Make sure you use these keywords in your page and meta description tag also.</li>
<li><strong>Divide your content for easy viewing</strong><br />
When I used to work in radio, I would cut my ads up with hashes so I knew where to breathe and how to see where things stopped and started. Having your phrases | separated | makes them easier | to read.</li>
<li><strong>Feed what they are looking for</strong><br />
If they are wanting to buy, use keywords like &#8220;shop&#8221; &#8220;purchase&#8221; etc.  If your page is a catalog or information, provide more keywords related to the content.</li>
<li><strong>Put your company name last</strong><br />
The beginning of a title tag is more powerful than the end of it.  Make your keywords show up first and then use your meta description tag your company identifier.</li>
<li><strong>Choose a format and stick with it</strong><br />
Nothing gets more annoying than going to a site where things change drastically from page to page.  Same with your title tag&#8230;make sure it uses the same format throughout your site.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you use a content management tool, make sure it allows you to customize your title tags or ask your developer how to affect them.  In our <a title="Content Management" href="http://www.hannush.com/small-business-services/38-diy-content-management.html">content management system (CMS)</a>, when you type in a title to your page, it is automatically  distributed to the title tag and to other critical parts of the page for SEO.</p>
<p>It is also critical to make sure you are using the right keywords.  Just because they seem powerful to you, doesn&#8217;t mean they are going to get results.  There are plenty of great secondary keywords and keyphrases that can be just as powerful as the main ones.  A <a title="Keyword Analysis" href="http://www.hannush.com/small-business-services/53-keyword-analysis.html?tab=seo20consulting">good keyword analysis</a> will get you off to a good start with your title tags.</p>
<p>Happy editing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/title-tags-for-search-engine-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now that Bing is #2, What Now For SEO?</title>
		<link>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/now-that-bing-is-2-what-now-for-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/now-that-bing-is-2-what-now-for-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Hannush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannush.com/blog/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a nutshell, its time to pay attention to the Yahoo!/Bing merger.  Microsoft made a master stroke waiting out Yahoo!&#8217;s ultimate fall.  They basically got Yahoo! search for a song. So, how do we adjust our strategies?  And is Bing worth paying attention to? Well, I wouldn&#8217;t revise my whole SEO strategy just yet.  It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a nutshell, its time to pay attention to the Yahoo!/Bing merger.  Microsoft made a master stroke waiting out Yahoo!&#8217;s ultimate fall.  They basically got Yahoo! search for a song.</p>
<p>So, how do we adjust our strategies?  And is Bing worth paying attention to?</p>
<p>Well, I wouldn&#8217;t revise my whole SEO strategy just yet.  It will be good to make some subtle changes, but you don&#8217;t want to throw out good Google practices for 15% to 30% of the search market.  And remember, Yahoo! was given some control of the display of Bing results on their site&#8230;plus Bing has the right to start integrating Yahoo search techniques into their own search, so many things could change.  (A good reason to have some money put in next year&#8217;s budget for SEO)</p>
<p>In the meantime, some things to consider to pump up your search results in Bing.<span id="more-322"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Think domain name and subdomain names.  Google is not as concerned with subdomains, but Bing likes the keywords that are provided in these.  Maybe add a couple targeted subdomains.</li>
<li>Ads, ads, ads&#8230;with Yahoo!&#8217;s need to sell and Microsoft&#8217;s sneaky way of putting ad results in the middle of real results, Bing CPC campaigns may soon challenge Google AdWords, if only for the fact the links will look less like ads.</li>
<li>Get your business into Bing&#8217;s Local Business directory.  Google cornered the market in business searches for a long time, but Bing&#8217;s advertising blitz may create a buzz that sticks.  Even if it doesn&#8217;t its more exposure for your business and that is a good thing.</li>
</ul>
<p>We&#8217;ll keep watching the trends.  Keep Bing on your radar&#8230;it could do your business good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/now-that-bing-is-2-what-now-for-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye Yahoo! Bing becomes #2 Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/goodbye-yahoo-bing-becomes-2-search-engine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/goodbye-yahoo-bing-becomes-2-search-engine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Hannush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannush.com/blog/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, if you haven&#8217;t heard already, once again Yahoo! has given up on search again. Quite a few years ago, Yahoo! gave away their search power to Google, using them as a major part of their search results.  Then management decided to break from Google and do it on their own. They had some success [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you haven&#8217;t heard already, once again Yahoo! has given up on search again.</p>
<p>Quite a few years ago, Yahoo! gave away their search power to Google, using them as a major part of their search results.  Then management decided to break from Google and do it on their own.</p>
<p>They had some success but could never touch the 60%+ market share that Google has enjoyed in the search engine race.</p>
<p>For the last year or so, Microsoft has made serious bids to buy the search feature, but Yahoo! wouldn&#8217;t sell.  Then Microsoft introduced Bing and the power dynamic changed.  Soon Bing was passing Yahoo! by.   The ultimate result&#8230;Yahoo! cuts their losses and doesn&#8217;t really get anything out of the agreement other than 88% of ad revenue from its ads placed on Bing.</p>
<p>Microsoft becomes the undisputed #2 in the search market with approximately 28% share (this of course will adjust depending on how the change is implemented and how much Yahoo! users like the idea or decide to jump ship for giant Google.</p>
<p>So for us in the <a href="http://www.hannush.com/small-business-services/39-website-design.html">web design</a> and <a href="http://www.hannush.com/small-business-services/35-seo-web2-consulting.html?tab=seo20consulting">SEO</a> market, its time to take a deep long look at our search engine strategies and make a bigger place for Bing&#8230;its not just another marketing play by Microsoft, this looks serious.</p>
<p>We will follow this story and will move our focus in discussions from Yahoo! to Bing and Google in the future.  Stay Tuned.  Meanwhile, check out latest articles on the merger.</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Business Week" href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jul2009/tc20090728_826397.htm" target="_blank">Yahoo Gives In to Microsoft, Gives Up on Search (Business Week)</a></li>
<li><a title="CNet" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10299313-2.html" target="_blank">With Yahoo Search Gone, Content Becomes King (CNet)</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/goodbye-yahoo-bing-becomes-2-search-engine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bada boom Bada &#8220;Bing&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/bada-boom-bada-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/bada-boom-bada-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drew Hannush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannush.com/blog/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, if at first you don&#8217;t succeed&#8230;rebrand!  At least that seems to be Microsoft&#8217;s plan on how to conquer the search engine market.  Consistently number 3 behind Google and Yahoo!, Microsoft has decided to dump its short lived &#8220;Live&#8221; branding for the new &#8220;Bing.com&#8221; What is so exciting about the new Bing.com you ask? Well, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, if at first you don&#8217;t succeed&#8230;rebrand!  At least that seems to be Microsoft&#8217;s plan on how to conquer the search engine market.  Consistently number 3 behind Google and Yahoo!, Microsoft has decided to dump its short lived &#8220;Live&#8221; branding for the new &#8220;Bing.com&#8221;</p>
<p>What is so exciting about the new Bing.com you ask?</p>
<p>Well, for  you&#8230;probably not a whole lot.  Yes, it does use a slightly different indexing method and algorithm, but in reality, regular searches don&#8217;t seem to deliver anything very different than its &#8220;Live&#8221; predecessor.  For shopping, it does seem to be branching into reviews and pricing searches (like mysimon.com is).  For maps it actually has my business location (which Google hasn&#8217;t gotten to yet).  The Bird&#8217;s Eye shots are really clean and crisp&#8230;  But again, searches don&#8217;t seem very advanced and not any more advanced than Google from my initial views.  Time will tell.</p>
<p>For Microsoft, they are going to go on a brand blitz, with millions of dollars going into pushing Bing.com as the hot new competition to Google.com.</p>
<p>You see, Microsoft&#8217;s Live search was no unnoteworthy that less than 1% of people actually typed in Live.com to do searches on the site&#8230;the other 99% came from MSN.com.  Google has no master website feeding it searches&#8230;it uses a combination of toolbar searches and direct access searches, which keeps Google&#8217;s name in the forefront.  So it seems Microsoft thinks its way to beat Google is to get a new brand developed again and just heavily promote it.</p>
<p>But this strategy hasn&#8217;t done Vista any favors.  Even though it really is a decent and stable operating system, it still has a bad name&#8230;no matter how much Microsoft promotes it.  They have started promoting &#8220;Windows&#8221; now more than &#8220;Vista&#8221; because the next operating system will be called &#8220;Windows 7.&#8221;  And maybe that is the key for Microsoft&#8230;stop coming up with cute names and different brands&#8230;and just call their search Windows Search or Microsoft Search&#8230;and then just make a product that doesn&#8217;t change every 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hannush.com/blog/web/2009/bada-boom-bada-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
